home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: news.sinet.slb.com!usenet
- From: bar@canuck.englewood.geoquest.slb.com (Bernhard A. Rieckhoff)
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.misc
- Subject: Re: MUI 3.2 vs. BGUI
- Date: 7 Feb 1996 22:26:09 GMT
- Organization: Schlumberger
- Message-ID: <4fb8u1$cnj@ohnasn01.sinet.slb.com>
- References: <bmaple.ie23@burner.com>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: 163.185.53.83
- X-Newsreader: knews 0.9.3
-
- In article <bmaple.ie23@burner.com>,
- bmaple@burner.com (Bob Maple) writes:
- >On Mon 5-Feb-1996 6:16a, IAN J. EINMAN wrote:
- >
- >IE> This is true, but the "bunch of extra garbage" is only one file, as
- >IE> opposed to my MUI 3.1 on my HD:
- >
- >IE> "TOTAL: 355 files - 40 directories - 3021 blocks used"
- >
- >MUI only requires a couple of libraries, and some programs require a couple of
- >extra classes not built into MUI already.
- >
- >Everything else that comes with MUI are just toys or extra addons (like all of
- >the replacement images) which you don't have to have around.
- >
- > : Bob Maple : In the beginning, the Universe was created. :
- > : bmaple@burner.com : This has made a lot of people very angry and :
- > : http://rmii.com/~bobm : been widely regarded as a bad move. .........:
-
- SO Why does the installer not have a "minimum install option" for us
- space challenged, or at least in the docs a paragraph telling the user
- what can be tossed? Especially those who only install Mui user to enable
- a piece of software to run and have no inclination to set up all kinds'a
- fancy prefs. Or why don't some of you wise guys that keep saying
- "you only need a couple'a ...." tell us what we can toss ?
-
- -Thank
- --
- PLEASE REPLY TO: brieckhoff@houston.geoquest.slb.com
- Bernhard Rieckhoff Sr. Geophysicist, Schlumberger-GeoQuest
- Denver, CO USA Voice (303) 486-3204 FAX (303) 694-4690
- *Opinions expressed here are unlikely to reflect those of my employer*
-
-